This is one of the big problems with social media and electronic marketing. Not only are all the good things able to be shared with the whole world (which is very important as we saw in the TED talk about crowd driven innovation) but the bad things are also able to be spread and the audience for embarrassing moments like this becomes global and increases by millions.
Thursday, October 21, 2010
Monday, September 27, 2010
LOL letterman twitter pt. 2
Following on from my last post; What these guys are talking about, i think, is pretty much the crux of the problem that most ppl who don't like twitter have with it. Is the product really any good? Or is it just reducing our social skills and bringing the society to a point where we can't converse in real life but only over an electronic medium? Kevin Spacey makes some pretty good points in his defense.
LOL letterman twitter
hahaha this is pretty funny.
It seems twitter cops a lot more flack than any other social networking tool and I'm not sure why. A lot of people (my parents included) can't comprehend why the hell anyone would use it or what you can accomplish by using it. The video shows that the transition into using the device also isn't as easy as it could be and I remember when I first stated I had no idea how to use it just like everyone else. But I really think twitter is a great tool and really, is just as useful as facebook or blogs or anything else in making contacts, keeping relationships alive and just building a network.
It seems twitter cops a lot more flack than any other social networking tool and I'm not sure why. A lot of people (my parents included) can't comprehend why the hell anyone would use it or what you can accomplish by using it. The video shows that the transition into using the device also isn't as easy as it could be and I remember when I first stated I had no idea how to use it just like everyone else. But I really think twitter is a great tool and really, is just as useful as facebook or blogs or anything else in making contacts, keeping relationships alive and just building a network.
Sunday, September 19, 2010
Social media piggybacking ok??
Hey everyone,
Yet another post about music and e-marketing; This week I was thinking about how bands and artists can use social networking and the halo effect to build a following. There are lots of bands in the Melbourne music scene who piggy back off the success of their friends' bands or bigger bands they now (eg. myspace top friends, online shout outs etc). Of course there is nothing wrong with this at all and it is a great way to get your name out there. However, is it OK to exploit these connections to score better and bigger shows than the bands actually deserve and are worth??
Because everyone in the scene (bands, promoters, venues, punters) has to look after their own agenda, they will simply do what they feel will best serve their own intentions. What this leads to is that there are a fair few bands that are not especially great but have one or two members who have great contacts in the industry (both here and internationally) and are quite popular on social media sites. Their online popularity and known/publicized contacts usually cloud promoters' judgments and they have a clear run at bigger shows. So is it morally wrong for promoters to constantly book bands based on their social media exploits and online friends rather than their musical endeavors???
Yet another post about music and e-marketing; This week I was thinking about how bands and artists can use social networking and the halo effect to build a following. There are lots of bands in the Melbourne music scene who piggy back off the success of their friends' bands or bigger bands they now (eg. myspace top friends, online shout outs etc). Of course there is nothing wrong with this at all and it is a great way to get your name out there. However, is it OK to exploit these connections to score better and bigger shows than the bands actually deserve and are worth??
Because everyone in the scene (bands, promoters, venues, punters) has to look after their own agenda, they will simply do what they feel will best serve their own intentions. What this leads to is that there are a fair few bands that are not especially great but have one or two members who have great contacts in the industry (both here and internationally) and are quite popular on social media sites. Their online popularity and known/publicized contacts usually cloud promoters' judgments and they have a clear run at bigger shows. So is it morally wrong for promoters to constantly book bands based on their social media exploits and online friends rather than their musical endeavors???
Monday, August 30, 2010
Awesome way to market through social media
Hey,
So recently a lot of music artists/bands in Australia have been releasing music online before physical distribution (if they physically distribute at all) and have found an awesome way to penetrate their target market and create a viral buzz. They set up a website for themselves where their fans can go and download or stream their new song or video. But before the fans can access the new material they need to enter their facebook or twitter user name and password and agree to let the site promote through their account. So every time someone downloads the song or listens to it or watches the video online, a tweet is automatically sent from their account or a link is sent through their fb page with a message saying "listening to (band name)'s (song name) for free, RT" or something similar to that. This may seem very small and insignificant but actually has a huge impact on the traffic to the site.
When one person does it, that message reaches all of their social network contacts of which a few are bound to do the same and it begins again. When some of the bigger bands release something, my facebook and twitter time line is often completely flooded with messages about what ppl are listening to or watching. This way of marketing is effective, virtually free, has a sense of credibility as it is coming from friends and peers and has the potential to snowball and get very big very quickly.
Here are some recent, bigger examples of what I'm talking about.
http://www.heroesforhire.com.au/
http://www.theamityaffliction.com/
Check them out :)
So recently a lot of music artists/bands in Australia have been releasing music online before physical distribution (if they physically distribute at all) and have found an awesome way to penetrate their target market and create a viral buzz. They set up a website for themselves where their fans can go and download or stream their new song or video. But before the fans can access the new material they need to enter their facebook or twitter user name and password and agree to let the site promote through their account. So every time someone downloads the song or listens to it or watches the video online, a tweet is automatically sent from their account or a link is sent through their fb page with a message saying "listening to (band name)'s (song name) for free, RT" or something similar to that. This may seem very small and insignificant but actually has a huge impact on the traffic to the site.
When one person does it, that message reaches all of their social network contacts of which a few are bound to do the same and it begins again. When some of the bigger bands release something, my facebook and twitter time line is often completely flooded with messages about what ppl are listening to or watching. This way of marketing is effective, virtually free, has a sense of credibility as it is coming from friends and peers and has the potential to snowball and get very big very quickly.
Here are some recent, bigger examples of what I'm talking about.
http://www.heroesforhire.com.au/
http://www.theamityaffliction.com/
Check them out :)
Friday, August 20, 2010
Who buys music any more????
We are in an era where physical forms of music purchase such as CDs or tapes are completely obsolete. CD sales have consistently been plummeting since napster was invented and artists have now given up hope of making money out of their recorded releases and now rely on money from live shows, label payments and endorsements for their living.
The only saving grace is that music is sold online through iTunes and other such mediums. Therefore because the product is being sold online, it needs to be marketed online. iTunes has come up with quite a useful program called 'genius' which reads your play list and suggests other bands/artists/albums that are similar and the user is likely to enjoy. This is great targeted advertising as it is not pushed and doesn't even look like advertising. It exposes new music to consumers who are most likely to buy it and offers the sale. Sites such as iLike serve a similar purpose of matching listeners with new music they might like.
A huge problem facing this industry is illegal, free downloads. Everyone does it and it is so easy to do. So when a product is readily available for free on the same medium as it is available for sale and there is no considerable difference in difficulty of acquisition or quality of product, why would anyone pay for music???
The only saving grace is that music is sold online through iTunes and other such mediums. Therefore because the product is being sold online, it needs to be marketed online. iTunes has come up with quite a useful program called 'genius' which reads your play list and suggests other bands/artists/albums that are similar and the user is likely to enjoy. This is great targeted advertising as it is not pushed and doesn't even look like advertising. It exposes new music to consumers who are most likely to buy it and offers the sale. Sites such as iLike serve a similar purpose of matching listeners with new music they might like.
A huge problem facing this industry is illegal, free downloads. Everyone does it and it is so easy to do. So when a product is readily available for free on the same medium as it is available for sale and there is no considerable difference in difficulty of acquisition or quality of product, why would anyone pay for music???
Friday, August 6, 2010
eBay makes ppl SO angry
hahaha SO angry!!!!
But seriously.
The anonymity that the internet creates for it's users is often a dangerous thing as people can try things that they wouldn't try in a non virtual environment. There is less accountability, less guilt and if done properly, less chance that a person's real name or image will be damaged. This is a major barrier for online marketing. Marketers in real life, face to face situations have the image of liars and scam artists, imagine how people feel about them when they can't even see them or know any of their real details. Has anyone ever thought that pop up saying "CONGRATULATIONS, YOU ARE THE 500,000TH VISITOR. YOU WIN $2M" is legit??? I did the first time I saw it when I was little... We had to get a new computer because of the viruses.
Yoohoo
YO!!!
So this is my first blog and all. It's for my e Marketing class and so pretty much every week I'm going to just come on here and say a little something about electronic marketing. Hopefully it will not be boring. Stay tuned y'all :D
So this is my first blog and all. It's for my e Marketing class and so pretty much every week I'm going to just come on here and say a little something about electronic marketing. Hopefully it will not be boring. Stay tuned y'all :D
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)